Please note that Vineeto’s correspondence below was written by the actually free Vineeto

(List D refers to Richard’s List D and his Respondent Numbers)

 

Vineeto’s Selected Correspondence

Actualism

February 21 2026

KUBA: I am seeing all this more clearly now, also I see where I have been going wrong in the past. The words “taking ‘myself’ into actuality” really summarise what ‘I’ had been doing. It’s all in the distinction between self-enhancing/ maintaining and self-diminishing. Back around the time of the fake out from control ‘I’ kept ‘myself’ intact, do-er and all, and then tried to shove this package into some manufactured, new state of ‘being’, that is the wrong direction, this is all self-enhancing/ maintaining. Just like actual freedom is a description of the condition which ensues when ‘I’ am eradicated, out from control is the description of the state which ensues when the do-er is abeyant. Meaning that both descriptions are referring to what happens when something is removed/out of the way, not when the already existing package is kept intact and taken into something more. And no wonder I was experiencing such intense resistance.

I can write this confidently now because I can experience what happens when for a period of time ‘I’ become somewhat diluted/irrelevant, then it is seen that ‘I’ have arrogated ‘myself’ over life with disastrous consequences, and then when this is seen all of a sudden everything is already in its rightful place. Then it is seen that it was ‘my’ absence/ diminishment which was needed in order to reveal the perfection and purity which was already actual all this time.

And this is so much easier in that sense, because in the past ‘I’ took on the impossible task of trying to match actuality, as ‘I’ was trying to shove ‘myself’ in there, this took enormous and ongoing effort, in that sudorific sense, and anyways ‘I’ failed every-time. But actually none of that was ever needed.

So what I am experiencing is exactly that sense of ‘me’ initially doing ‘my’ normal order of operations, control and all, and then it’s like everything stops as ‘I’ realise that once again ‘I’ am simply arrogating ‘myself’ over life, that this is not needed, it’s this extra thing that does nobody any favours.

But then I have been thinking, the way Richard described ‘my’ self-immolation, that after the fact one (as a flesh and blood body) can know that ‘I’ never actually existed in the first place, and yet for ‘me’ it is a death which is as real as it gets. And it seems similar with this issue of control, in that for ‘me’ as the do-er ‘my’ control is very real, ‘I’ cannot abandon control by merely adopting a belief that says “‘I’ was never really in control", this would be more like some buddhistic thing, it’s self-deception. Rather it is only when ‘I’ have already allowed life to happen of its own accord that ‘I’ can then look back and see that none of that activity was ever needed, but the do-er cannot know this from behind ‘his’ throne, it is only known when the do-er has already got out of the way, willingly.

Although these descriptions are still only temporary excursions, this is not the actualism process having been set in motion.

VINEETO: Hi Kuba,

This is such a wonderful summary of the whole process of actualism – I thoroughly enjoyed it.

It’s spelling it out that the whole method and process of actualism is about diminishing what is in the way of actuality becoming apparent, removing one ‘self-centric habit/ belief/ action of ‘me’ after another. In principle it is all so simple, the doing of it is another matter.

The reason why/ when putting this insight into practice is difficult is because each of us has/ had an in-built screaming baby, my ‘self’, made very real and convincing via feelings and passions as part of the animal inheritance, which obscures this very simply fact: when ‘I’ stop screaming (passionately feeling this or that and insisting that ‘I’ have to be somebody, somebody special) then there is peace and perfection.

Hence all the various actualism techniques to quiet down the screaming baby and slowly seduce it to stop flailing and thrashing about and start enjoying and appreciating being here, being alive and revel in the fact that everything is already perfect.

I think the two most potent techniques at any stage in the process are

1. being kind to yourself and
2. put everything on an ‘it-doesn’t-really-matter’ basis.

If you can sincerely and consistently apply both these techniques, the process of undoing your ‘self’ is increasingly enjoyable and immense cause for appreciation.

Besides, nothing really matters in the long run, because in the end ‘you’ will quit (either involuntary when your life-time is up, or voluntarily at any time ‘you’ are ready). You, Kuba, say above – “for ‘me’ it is a death which is as real as it gets”. It’s only a death as long as there is still resistance to see sense, complete 100% sense – then it’s a longed-for abdication, a willing disappearance into oblivion because (to quote Geoffrey) “no ‘weight’, no drama… just the only thing that made sense, the only sensible thing.” I know from ‘Vineeto’, first one needs to wrestle with, and/or soothe, and/or seduce, the screaming ‘me’ who doesn’t want to see sense.

It is already always perfect, perfection is already here. Stand still and ‘come’ here where you already are.

Give yourself permission to give up all responsibility and all struggle. As Richard says to ‘Vineeto’ in the Out-from-Control video: “I have no responsibility”.

Andrew might like this one too. (see )

Cheers Vineeto (Actualism, Actualvineeto, Kuba12, 21 February 2026).

May 4 2026

KUBA: My sights have been constantly on actual freedom, although there has been so much enjoyment and appreciation in the meantime. Since the other day it has happened a few times that I experienced the sweetness of pure intent and following in that direction there were glimpses of the actual world, where there is only that pure intent, everywhere all at once. And this feature is outstanding too, that this what is happening now is so incredible, and yet that world (where pure intent is everywhere all at once / all that is left) is another ballgame altogether.

I am not sure if there is anything else that ‘I’ need to do / can do, which is not already happening. It looks now that I am only left with what Richard wrote here:

Richard: After living in the condition of virtual freedom for sufficient time to absorb all the ramifications of a blithesome life, it is highly likely that the ultimate condition can happen. ‘I’ do not make it happen, because ‘I’ cannot make it happen. What is more … ‘I’ am not required to make it happen. An actual freedom happens of itself only when one is fully ready, and not before. One has to become acclimatised to benignity, benevolence and blitheness, because the purity of the actual is so powerful that it would “blow the fuses” if one was to venture into this territory ill-prepared. To precipitously apprehend the vast stillness of infinitude would be too much, too fast, too soon … one could go mad with the super-abundance of pleasure that pours forth. The in-built tendency of the universe to achieve the optimum knows best as to when the time is right. (Richard’s Journal, Article 23, pp. 168/169)

VINEETO: Hi Kuba,

I much appreciate your delightful reports. As you noticed I have taken a backseat on commenting to what you write as it is explicit in itself. Regarding your remark that “I am not sure if there is anything else that ‘I’ need to do / can do, which is not already happening” I just found a succinct summary of Respondent No. 4, List D, which expresses what he described as the actualism process (whilst still in-control himself) –

Richard: His summary at Message No. 8138 contains the most succinct way I have seen to deliver the essence of how actualism operates (the second last paragraph) –

Respondent No. 4:It all starts with being as fundamentally benign as possible. That’s the bedrock on which you can base an in-control happiness ... which can then lead to an out-from-control happiness/ delight/ wonderment ... which leads to more and more direct experiences of the actual world ... where everything is doing itself.

And once you tap into this often enough, and the sheer (f)actuality of the universe is what eventually does ‘you’ in. (Message 8138, 11 December 2009).

(Richard, List D, No. 12, 12 December 2009).

The addition from the closing paragraph of the same post is for sheer enjoyment –

Richard: I will leave the remainder of your response for another day as ... um ... as The-Lady-Who-Had-The-5-Month-PCE and The-Spouse-Of-The-Lady-Who-Had-The-Five-Month-PCE will be arriving shortly to spend the day with me.

As that laboured nomenclature is somehow reminiscent of Mr. Rolf Harris’ ditty ‘The Court of King Caractacus’ I will be making it a first priority to have them both come up with something much simpler.

As to “the sheer (f)actuality of the universe is what eventually does ‘you’ in”, this excerpt from the Direct Route correspondence may be informative –

Subscriber No. 10: Could you describe any differences (no matter how subtle) between actual freedom and PCE’s?

Vineeto: It’s not subtle at all.

The PCE always had a ‘WOW’-factor, which happens when the identity (in abeyance) comments on this body’s experience of the actual world. In an actual freedom this ‘WOW’-factor is absent – everything is just ordinary and magical at the same time.

In a PCE I always knew (apart from the very first PCE) that this experience would eventually fade whereas an actual freedom is forever and can therefore be explored far deeper and infinitely further (literally) than any PCE ever could.

A PCE has a static quality to it as the identity is in abeyance and temporarily ‘allows’ this flesh and blood body a brief glimpse into the actual world whereas an actual freedom is the dynamic vital in-depth and forever ongoing experience of the magic quality of actuality each moment again.

Subscriber No. 10: This ‘sweetness’ that is talked about is still affective? So, it is as close as a feeling-entity can be to actual freedom, but it is not as close to actual freedom as a PCE?

Vineeto: Peter wrote in his report – Peter: “a sweetness that was palpable rather than feeling based. I heard the words ‘This is not only for me, this is for everybody’ as I was literally being bathed in this sweetness.”

I [‘Vineeto’] reported that “I had known this sweetness from previous occasions – one such experience happened during the video-shoot of the ‘Out-from-Control’ DVD we present on the website. This sweetness always accompanied an experience (...) that I was close to my destiny and an awareness that what I am doing/ longing for is not merely for my ‘peace of mind’, but that it is for everybody, for every single man, woman and child on the planet – for peace on earth.”

This experience of sweetness is about being close to one’s destiny (actual freedom) whereas a PCE is a glimpse into the actual world that can happen anywhere/ anywhen on the path/ during the process to one’s destiny. (Direct Route, No. 10, 15 January 2010).

Cheers Vineeto (Actualism, Actualvineeto, Kuba 13, 4 May 2026).

 

 

 

Selected Correspondence Index

Actual Vineeto’s Correspondence Index

Actualism Homepage

Actual Freedom Homepage

Freedom from the Human Condition – Happy and Harmless

Vineeto’s & Richard’s Text ©The Actual Freedom Trust: 1997-. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer and Use Restrictions and Guarantee of Authenticity