|
Selected Writings on Pure
Consciousness Experiences from

Richard’s Journal
Peter’s Journal
Onsets of a PCE
Vineeto’s Writing
Personal Reports
Affective Experiences vs.
Pure Experiences
Descriptions
of PCEs
____________________
Discussions about Pure Consciousness Experiences

Audio-taped Dialogue
Richard
| 2 | 3
| 4 |
Peter | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Vineeto | 2 |
Others
|
Pure Consciousness Experience
Pure Consciousness
Experience: During meditation (...) one may become utterly silent inside, as though in a gap between thoughts, where one
becomes completely perception- and thought-free. One neither thinks nor perceives any mental or sensory content. Yet, despite this
suspension of content, one emerges from such events confident that one had remained awake inside, fully conscious. This
experience, which has been called the pure consciousness event, or PCE, has been identified in virtually every tradition. Though
PCEs typically happen to any single individual only occasionally, they are quite regular for some practitioners. The pure
consciousness event may be defined as a wakeful but contentless (non-intentional) consciousness. Robert Forman
Pure Consciousness Experience: Mr. Robert
Forman, on page 131 of the ‘Journal of Consciousness Studies’, Volume 5, Issue 2, 1998, (in a paper called ‘What Does
Mysticism Have To Teach Us About Consciousness?’), described the introversive ASC [altered state of consciousness] as a pure
consciousness event so as to emphasise the absence of any experienced object – it is pure subjectivity in other words –
which is also why such terminology as ‘Consciousness Without An Object’ is used to describe the totally senseless and
thoughtless trance state known as ‘dhyana’ in Sanskrit (Hinduism) and as ‘jhana’ in Pali (Buddhism). In the West such a
state can only be described as catalepsy [a condition of trance or seizure with loss of sensation or consciousness and abnormal
maintenance of posture] and a never-ending ‘dhyana’ or ‘jhana’ would result in the body wasting away until its inevitable
physical death ... as a means of obtaining peace-on-earth it is completely useless. When I first came onto the internet in 1997 I
subscribed for a while to an academic consciousness studies mailing list associated with the ‘Journal of Consciousness
Studies’ and it was there I first heard of the phrase ‘pure consciousness event’ – with the emphasis that there be no
experiencing in such a state – and thus chose the phrase ‘pure consciousness experience’ so as to make the generic phrase
‘peak experience’ I had been using for eleven years more specific and to regain the actual purity of the unadulterated
sensuous experience of consciousness without a subject (a body sans identity) from the adulterated mystical experience of
consciousness without an object (an identity sans body). Richard
Richard: A PCE is when
one’s sense of identity temporarily vacates the throne and apperception occurs. Apperception is the mind’s perception of
itself … it is a pure awareness . Normally the mind perceives through the senses and sorts the data received according to its
predilection; but the mind itself remains unperceived ... it is taken to be unknowable. Apperception is when the ‘thinker’ and
the ‘feeler’ is not and an unmediated awareness occurs. The pure consciousness experience is as if one has eyes in the back of
one’s head; there is a three hundred and sixty degree awareness and all is self-evidently clear.
This is knowing by direct
experience, unmoderated by any ‘self’ whatsoever. One is able to see that ‘I’ and ‘me’ have been standing in the way
of the perfection and purity that is the essential character of this moment of being here becoming apparent. Here a solid and
irrefutable native intelligence can operate freely because the ‘thinker’ and the ‘feeler’ is in abeyance. One is the
universe ’s experience of itself as a human being ... after all, the very stuff this body is made of is the very stuff of the
universe. There is no ‘outside’ to the perfection of the universe to come from; one only thought and felt that one was a
separate identity.
Apperception is something that brings the
facticity born out of a direct experience of the actual . Then what one is (‘what’ not ‘who’) is these sense organs in
operation: this seeing is me, this hearing is me, this tasting is me, this touching is me, this smelling is me, and this thinking
is me. Whereas ‘I’, the identity, am inside the body: looking out through ‘my’ eyes as if looking out through a window,
listening through ‘my’ ears as if they were microphones, tasting through ‘my’ tongue, touching through ‘my’ skin,
smelling through ‘my’ nose, and thinking through ‘my’ brain. Of course
‘I’ must feel isolated, alienated, alone and lonely, for ‘I’ am cut off from the magnificence of the actual world – the
world as-it-is – by ‘my’ very presence.
|
To get out of
stuckness and induce a Pure Consciousness Experience one gets off one’s backside and does whatever one knows best to activate
delight. Delight is what is humanly possible, given sufficient pure intent obtained from the felicity born of the pure
consciousness experience, and from the position of delight, one can vitalise one’s joie de vivre by the amazement at the fun of
it all ... and then one can – with sufficient abandon – become over-joyed and move into marvelling at being here and doing
this business called being alive now. Then one is no longer intuitively making sense of life ... the delicious wonder of it all
drives any such instinctive meaning away. Such luscious wonder fosters the innate condition of naiveté – the nourishing of
which is essential if fascination in it all is to occur – and the charm of life itself easily engages dedication to
peace-on-earth. Then, as one gazes intently at the world about by glancing lightly with sensuously caressing eyes, out of the
corner of one’s eye comes – sweetly – the magical fairy-tale-like paradise that this verdant earth actually is ... and one
is the experiencing of what is happening. But refrain from possessing it and making it your own ... or else ‘twill vanish as
softly as it appeared.
When one
remembers a PCE – or precipitates another – then one is well on the way to freedom ... this is what actualism is all about.
Scattered along the wide and wondrous path to an actual freedom are as many PCEs as one may need ... repeated peak experiences may
very well be brought about on maybe a daily basis with constant application of reflective and fascinated contemplation . In such
pure contemplation, ‘I’ cease seeing and seeing takes place of its own accord. ‘I’ can never be here now in this actual
world for ‘I’ am an interloper, an alien in psychic possession of the body. ‘I’ do not belong here.
All this is impossible to
imagine which is why it is essential to be confident that the actual world does exist. This confidence is born out of knowing,
which is derived from the PCE, and is an essential ingredient to ensure success. One does not have to generate confidence oneself
– as the religions require of one with regard to their blind faith – the purity of the actual world bestows this confidence
upon one. The experience of purity is a benefaction. Out of this blessing comes pure intent, which will consistently guide one
through daily life, gently ushering in an increasing ease and generosity of character. With this growing magnanimity, one becomes
more and more anonymous, more and more self-less. With this expanding altruism one becomes less and less self-centred, less and
less egocentric. Eventually the moment comes wherein something definitive happens, physically, inside the brain and ‘I’ am
nevermore.
Library Index
Freedom from the Human Condition – Happy and Harmless
Richard’s Text ©The Actual
Freedom Trust: 1997-. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer and Use Restrictions
|