Actual Freedom – Mailing List ‘D’ Correspondence

January 1 2013

Re: it is impossible to marry Actualism and Buddhism

RESPONDENT No. 19: [...] Your not needing humility with which we cover our pride gives us an appearance that you are proud (which I have tried to communicate in my earlier mails that your words appear to be grandiose viewed from here, but which seems to have been killed by your analytic dissecting knife which is too sharp for the jelly-o points that we try to make).

RICHARD: Once again, I fail to comprehend how my making a one-off exception, in regards to not rebutting/ refuting each and every one of all that made-up stuff about a phantom ‘Richard’, and providing a one-off opportunity for your co-respondent to produce those so-called ‘reports’ of so-called ‘woman bashing’, for me to respond to in detail, would inspire you to say that it [quote] ‘gives us an appearance that you are proud’ [endquote].

RESPONDENT No. 19: I am not sure if this is an effective way of communication to achieve your own goals.

RICHARD: Whereas I am quite sure that your [quote] ‘effective way of communication’ [endquote] – that is, encouraging your co-respondent to [quote] ‘rephrase things in a better way’ [end quote] – will result in you being able to [quote] ‘achieve your own goals’ [endquote], of having actualism/ actual freedom continue to be subject to (faux) vilification, as encouragement like that is grist for his mill. Vis.:

[Respondent No. 19 to No. 5 (Sock Puppet ‘H‘)]: ‘You will serve your case, if you could rephrase things in a better way, even if Richard doesn’t address them well, *others might be able to see your points better*’ [emphasis added].

‘Tis plain to see what your agenda is, No. 19, and it is indicative of the climate of this forum (where the victim receives zilch support and the abuser is encouraged) that you be appointed a moderator by the list-owner (aka ‘actual-buddhist-george’) after he pulled a power-trip on the other moderator (revoking his function) for attempting to moderate the abuser.

Nevertheless, and despite that preposterous climate, the fact remains that if your co-respondent does not produce his so-called ‘reports’ of so-called ‘woman bashing’ then, by not doing so, he is tacitly admitting to all and sundry they have no existence outside of his passionate imagination. Richard to No. 19, 1 January 2013

RESPONDENT No. 12: Hi Richard, Wow, 32 of your messages have been deleted. I thought I recalled you saying you’ve had messages deleted, but I had no idea it was that many. Is there any way I could see those? I’d like to know just what our moderator(s) have been suppressing and why(I figure the why would be made apparent by reading the what). Some people here really have reason to be ashamed of themselves it would seem.

Kind regards, [No. 12]

RESPONDENT: The number deleted by me is: Zero.

RICHARD: G’day [List Owner], Whereas the number dutifully deleted by virtue of your specifically delegated authority is ... is how many? Vis.:

[List Owner]: ‘(...). I am revoking No. 24’s moderator status and appointing No. 19 co-owner of this group in the expectation that he will *better represent the principles above*. He knows nothing of this decision and bears no *responsibility* for this action’. [emphases added].

Just in case it passed you by I will draw your attention to what I wrote further above. Vis.:

[Richard]: ‘Tis plain to see what your agenda is, No. 19, and it is indicative of the climate of this forum (where the victim receives zilch support and the abuser is encouraged) that you be appointed a moderator by the list-owner (aka ‘actual-buddhist-george’) after he pulled a power-trip on the other moderator (revoking his function) for attempting to moderate the abuser’.

They are *your* rules, [List Owner], theatrically enforced by your brute demonstration of power, whereby the designated moderator gets their function revoked unless they comply with them (such that the victim now receives zilch support and the abuser is thereby encouraged).

Even more to that point: on numerous occasions I have drawn attention to the fact that I have been subjected to the most massive invasion of privacy this forum has ever seen, such as to put into jeopardy both my personal security and my physical safety, and yet you have done and continue to do absolutely nothing about it despite your avowed intent in this regard. Vis.:

[List Owner]: ‘(...). Moderation privileges should be used only to remove spam or to delete messages which violate an individual’s right to *privacy or safety*. [emphasis added].

And yet:

[List Owner to No. 19]: ‘(...). I have no problem with anything that you or the other moderators have done’. (Message 12xxx).

Put succinctly, my clearly expressed wishes, regarding personal security and physical safety, were posted at 7:25 am on Sunday May 10, 2009. Vis.:

[Richard]: ‘(...). I will also take this opportunity to ask the owner of this list (not the moderators for it appears one of them is corrupt) to delete every post/every instance where that name appears’. (Message 5387)

I would suggest accessing that URL as there is both a clear demonstration and further explanation regarding this whole sordid matter.

Regards, Richard.

RETURN TO MAILING LIST ‘D’ INDEX

RICHARD’S HOME PAGE

The Third Alternative

(Peace On Earth In This Life Time As This Flesh And Blood Body)

Here is an actual freedom from the Human Condition, surpassing Spiritual Enlightenment and any other Altered State Of Consciousness, and challenging all philosophy, psychiatry, metaphysics (including quantum physics with its mystic cosmogony), anthropology, sociology ... and any religion along with its paranormal theology. Discarding all of the beliefs that have held humankind in thralldom for aeons, the way has now been discovered that cuts through the ‘Tried and True’ and enables anyone to be, for the first time, a fully free and autonomous individual living in utter peace and tranquillity, beholden to no-one.