|

Selected Correspondence Vineeto
How to Become Free from the
Human Condition
Actualism
Homepage
So, Gary, I have chipped away a bit of rust in my thinking and writing gear
and oiled my mental pathways, relearning English grammar as I write and remembering descriptive words with the help of
the thesaurus. My brain these days is often in neutral when I don’t use it for particular tasks – something that I
still find surprising when I become aware of it. I do find it curious that after four years of actively demolishing my
‘self’ using the method of actualism all I now have to do is to remember not to yield to the temptation of
interfering with the perfection that is already happening.

Vineeto says ‘...one can either focus on sensate
experiencing, thereby avoiding undesirable affective experiencing – trying to become an un-feeling ‘self’...’ http://www.actualfreedom.com.au/actualism/vineeto/selected-correspondence/corr-method6.htm.
Is ‘coming to your senses’ an avoidance technique? What are the differences and similarities between haietmoba and
‘coming to your senses’?
As No 108 (R) and No 66 have already pointed out, coming to one’s senses is
not the same as focussing (only) on sensate experiencing whilst simultaneously neglecting, avoiding, denying, repressing
or dissociating from whatever affective feelings are going on at the time. This makes no sense.
Here is the text you quoted in context –
‘How’, not ‘what’ is indeed the clue to the difference
between attentiveness with pure intent and the passive awareness of Eastern tradition. It had never occurred to me that
it is this word that signifies the vital difference, but now that you said it is perfectly obvious – ‘how’
inquires into the quality of the experience and then the pure intent to improve the quality of this moment to be
both more happy and more harmless indicates what needs to be done. Whereas ‘what’ simply takes stock of the content
of one’s experience and by doing so one can either focus on sensate experiencing, thereby avoiding undesirable
affective experiencing – trying to become an un-feeling ‘self’ – or one can focus on desirable affective
experiencing, thereby regarding what one sensately experiences as being secondary or even illusionary – trying to
become a non-thinking, dissociated ‘self’. Vineeto, List AF, No 37, 12.5.2004
As becomes obvious when the quote is read in full, I was talking about the
danger of slipping into a non-thinking, dissociated and un-feeling ‘self’ by mistaking the actualism method as being
yet another version of the passive/selective awareness of Eastern mysticism – passive as in evoking no fundamental
change and selective as in avoiding the dark side that is present in every instinctual being. More than a few people
have mis-interpreted the actualism method as a tool for ignoring or dissociating from one’s affective feelings by
focussing on and identifying with one’s senses and then wondering why this scheme did not work to evince the desired
happiness and innocuousness. As Richard only recently pointed out –
Richard – ‘The phrase ‘nipping them in the bud’
is not to be confused with either suppression/ repression or ignoring/ avoiding ... it is to be consciously and
deliberatively – with knowledge aforethought – declining oh-so-sensibly to futilely go down that well-trodden path
to nowhere fruitful yet again.’ Richard List AF, No.87, 4.3.2006
When I ask myself how am I experiencing this moment of being alive then this
question automatically focuses my attention both on my senses and on the feelings and emotions which prevent me from
fully enjoying the sensate delights of being alive. By being constantly aware what it is that is preventing me from
enjoying being alive now I am actively coming to my senses, literally and figuratively. Or to put it another way –
actualism does require that you engage brain to come to your senses, as in not being so silly of wasting this moment by
not being happy while doing whatever you happen to be doing and/or by not being harmless towards your fellow human
beings.

My email (as evinced by the subject: No 66’s food
is fine with Daddy) was not about his diet per se, but about his seeking approval from others for his behaviour.
Considering that you sign your posts with the title ‘Peace
on Earth in This Lifetime as This Flesh and Blood Body’, have you ever wondered why it is that you felt to
publicly and unsolicitedly reprehend a fellow human being in a forum like this? Have you not understood that peace on
earth in this lifetime for this flesh and blood body entails changing one person and one person only – ‘me’– and
as such what other people choose to do with their lives is entirely their business?
For me the practice of actualism meant that I began to become attentive to
and aware of my own feelings and my own behaviour and become vitally interested in how I felt, what I felt and why I
felt it whenever my feelings interfered with my being happy and harmless.
I knew that the investigation into myself had to be experiential if it was to
bring any tangible results – thinking about feelings and emotions removed from down-to-earth personal experience would
have kept me at a surface level and would have prevented me from penetrating into the very nature of my psyche. So the
first thing for me to learn was to stop repressing and ignoring my feelings, to stop fighting my feelings and to stop
feeding and expressing my feelings and instead allow myself to attentively experience my feelings … all the while
making sure that I kept my mouth shut and my hands in my pockets, in order that I wouldn’t do or say something I’d
have to regret or feel remorseful about later on.
The next stage was to make sense of my thoughts and feelings as I became
aware of them. Of course, in order to make any sense out of why I was having the feeling, I needed to get back to
feeling at least reasonably good again by recognizing that it is patently silly to waste this moment of being alive by
being righteous or bored or frustrated or worried or gloomy. Then when I was back to being able to think clearly, the
real job begins, which is finding out what got me into this particular mess in the first place and how I can avoid
falling into the same trap next time around.
Then I could begin to discern what was going on – not in the usual terms of
right and wrong, good and bad, virtuous and reprehensible, but in more pragmatic down-to-earth terms of what exactly was
the feeling I was feeling – am I feeling sad, am I feeling angry, am I feeling bored, am I feeling scared and so on.
It was not an easy thing to do at first but persistence combined with intent eventually enabled me to acknowledge and
label the feeling I was having while the feeling was running. I soon became aware that my social and instinctual
identity thrives on gloomy and antagonistic feelings as well as on loving and compassionate feelings and I am now more
and more able to choose to nip the arising feelings in the bud before they can interfere with my feeling excellent.

When you set your aim to become happy and harmless you enter into an
agreement with yourself, so to speak, to not let anything stand in the way of getting back to feeling good – in other
words you make a conscious decision to make feeling good about being here, right now, your default feeling state. This
intent in turn helps to re-kindle one’s own long-lost naiveté which then helps you to return to feeling good for no
other reason than that you are alive and conscious in this spectacular abundant universe. As an adult you have the added
bonus of being able to take note of the triggers that had caused you to stop feeling good in order to avoid this
particular pitfall the next time round.
[quote] Peter: …
you have set yourself a goal in life – to feel good or feel excellent – and then you are investigating whatever
stands in the way of your goal. If you started off feeling really good and suddenly noticed as you put your feet up at
lunchtime that you have lost it and are feeling a bit low, then put a name on the feeling – say annoyed – and then
trace back and remember when you came off feeling good and why. If it was something someone said, have a root around and
discover why you became annoyed.
What button was pushed – was it pride, was it guilt, was it your manliness,
was it some moral view you held that was offended? When you have milked the event or incident for what it was worth and
discovered a bit about yourself and what makes ‘you’ tick, then you get back to feeling good or you even crank up a
bit of feeling excellent at having been aware of how you were experiencing that particular moment of being alive and had
made some discoveries about yourself. Peter, List AF, No. 3d, 16.4.2001
I wonder if this is a point of disagreement between
yourself then and Peter because this again shows the ‘contradiction’ No. 92 pointed out. Peter seems to be saying
here that getting back to feeling good is what happens as a result of the investigation – as Richard also seems to
say.
You’ve discussed this point before in a previous correspondence with
Richard –
So far, tracking back and investigating has not made
me feel any better.
Richard: In a nutshell: one cannot examine
something fully if one is busy denying its existence.
Re: Getting Back To Feeling Good, Tue 28/03/2006 9:50 AM
Getting back to feeling good is not ‘a result of the investigation’ but
is a result of one’s intent to be as happy and harmless as humanly possible – ‘happiness
has to be chosen by focussing on felicity’, as No. 37 wrote. The result of investigating your beliefs and
feelings is a continued and increasingly uninterrupted happiness and harmlessness for the simple reason that less and
less events will trigger any non-felicitous feelings.
As you have probably noticed yourself, when you are in the clasp of
depression or in a fit of rage or gripped by fear that it is impossible to think straight, let alone to sort out the
underlying reasons, beliefs, convictions and/or expectations why you feeling the way you are feeling? The only thing you
can do is noting the feelings that are happening and noting what triggered those feelings. This is what actualists
sometimes call ‘milking the feeling for what it’s worth’ or getting all the information you need to out of the
situation in order to later examine the feeling fully. Once you have the information you want you get yourself out of
feeling bad as quickly as possible.
When you are back to feeling good then you can sit down, put up your feet and
reflect on what happened, what pattern was played out, what possible belief, worldview, opinion, principle or habit,
caused you to automatically respond to a situation in this way, i.e. which aspect of your identity stuffed up your being
happy, in order to avoid falling into the same trap next time.
There is nothing contradictory at all about Peter’s and my descriptions
about putting the actualism method into practice (I know because living with Peter we regularly talk about everything
pertaining to our daily lives and haven’t had a disagreement on how we are practicing actualism yet). You will come to
find out for yourself when you will put the actualism method into practice for yourself instead of finding apparent
contradictions as ‘arguments for the purpose of greater intellectual understanding of AF’.
Anyway, I understand your point about intent being
the way to getting back to feeling good and then investigating afterwards. Both seem to be correct but I feel like I
need the two points to be acknowledged as differing.
If you still think they are two points instead of one then why don’t you
try out both the apparently differing ways when you inquire into your feelings of ‘dull listlessness and resentment
of being here’, for instance. I’ll be interested to hear of your experiential report as to what works best for
you.

I would like to point out that I was not comparing
Actualism and Zen, per se, it was the actual exercises that I was asking about, which was to give me an idea if I was
understanding HAIETMOBA correctly.
Whilst I appreciate your intentions I’d have to say that you were in fact ‘comparing
Actualism and Zen, per se’ – the ‘actual exercise’ of both actualism and Zen is only meaningful when
seen in context with their relevant goals and, in the case of Zen, in context with the philosophy that underpins it and
in the case of actualism, with the understanding about the nature of ‘me’.
Is there an example of this exercise being explained
from beginning to end that I haven’t came across yet?
Possibly. There are several description of the method of actualism – I can
recommend all of
Richard’s articles, but specifically on this topic ‘This Moment of Being Alive’, ‘A Précis Of Actual Freedom’
and ‘Attentiveness And Sensuousness And Apperceptiveness’.
Peter wrote about the method in the ‘Introduction
to an Actual Freedom’ which I think you already found and I have selected some of my writings on ‘How to
Investigate Feelings’.
Additionally there are the selected topics in the Library on ‘How Am I Experiencing This Moment
of Being Alive’ and on ‘Actualism’. If this is too voluminous for you, I can point you to Frequently asked
questions –
‘What is the answer to ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ and ‘How do I
induce a PCE?’
Maybe I could make this a little clearer ... When I
label the feeling and investigate it, is there a further technique for getting rid of the feeling that I am having?
Here is an excerpt from the originator of the method –
Richard: ‘... if ‘I’ am not feeling good
then ‘I’ have something to look at to find out why. What has happened, between the last time ‘I’ felt good and
now? When did ‘I’ feel good last? Five minutes ago? Five hours ago? What happened to end those felicitous feelings?
Ahh ... yes: ‘He said that and I ...’. Or: ‘She didn’t do this and I ...’. Or: ‘What I wanted was ...’.
Or: ‘I didn’t do ...’. And so on and so on ... one does not have to trace back into one’s childhood ... usually
no more than yesterday afternoon at the most (‘feeling good’ is an unambiguous term – it is a general sense of
well-being – and if anyone wants to argue about what feeling good means ... then do not even bother trying to do this
at all). Once the specific moment of ceasing to feel good is pin-pointed, and the silliness of having such an incident
as that (no matter what it is) take away one’s enjoyment and appreciation of this only moment of being alive is seen
for what it is – usually some habitual reactive response – one is once more feeling good ... but with a pin-pointed
cue to watch out for next time so as to not have that trigger off yet another bout of the same-old same-old. This is
called nipping it in the bud before it gets out of hand ... with application and diligence and patience and perseverance
one soon gets the knack of this and more and more time is spent enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive.
And, of course, once one does get the knack of this, one up-levels ‘feeling good’, as a bottom line each moment
again, to ‘feeling happy and harmless’ ... and after that to ‘feeling perfect’ ...’. Richard, Articles, This Moment of Being Alive
Or is it observing the feelings as they happen that
lessens their grip?
Personally, observing the feeling was not enough – I had my fair share of
this observing business in my spiritual year and the only result was detachment. In actualism I look for the cause that
prevents me from being happy and harmless in this moment and mostly, seeing and understanding the cause, coupled with
pure intent, is sufficient to get me back to feeling happy again. If not, then I need to dig a bit deeper why my feeling
of worry, misery, anger, love, loneliness, etc persists, for instance I need to look for a particular pattern, or habit,
or a perceived advantage that persuades me to choose to be miserable.

I am interested in experiencing exactly what you are
talking about.
As I said before there is a double approach to actual freedom. On one side
you try and remember or evoke a peak-experience, and it is very helpful to get more and more an experience of those ‘moments
without self’. An actuality of being here which is so pure, so sensately rich, so all-involving that there is simply
no room for love, God or any other feeling – no room for a ‘me’. You may find, like No. 6, short moments of ‘WOW’,
or a perfection when seeing a particular cloud-formation in stunning colours, just before ‘the heart’ chimes in with
gratitude, reverence, beauty, awe, love, bitter-sweet sadness or admiration. Or you have a moment of quietly enjoying
the sound of rain pouring on leaves, clinking on the roof, pouring and pouring, ... before a complaint, a worry, or any
other emotion sets in.
The other side of the double approach is finding the ‘self’ in action
with the question: ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’
It is a perfect question to determine how the ‘self’ is present – what
feeling do ‘I’ have now?, what objection to being here?, what longing to connect with someone?, what slight feeling
of numbness or boredom?, what irritation about someone’s words or behaviour? Driving a car was always a good test for
me, so many ways to get irritated, and so unnecessarily.
Exploring the substance the ‘self’ is made of ... ... ... ... and then,
one day, a peak-experience comes sneaking around the corner.

Vineeto, You and also others have mentioned a
possibility of auto-rewiring of a brain as a result of a prolonged PCE experience. Have you noticed some old habits,
gestures and body poses disappear? (If you disconnect synapses the vanishing habits could be used as indication that one
is going into the right direction). As an example of what I am talking about, I noticed my semi-conscious habit of
scratching my moustache (my brain must like the sensation of the moustache touching the soft skin on my fingertips), or
earlier in my life, as a child, any pointed object. Or a habit of sleeping on your back, etc, etc.
The way you put the question, it sounds like as if one only has to find a
switch (a prolonged PCE) and then – whoosh – the brain is auto-rewiring itself into the desired programmed
position. That might be possible for computer programs, although even that is not an easy matter, but human beings
function differently. One has to actively investigate into and progressively eliminate one’s emotions, beliefs and
instinctual passions that constitute the ‘self’. To embark on such a thrilling adventure which will irrevocably
change you, the one you think and feel you are, you will need to know what you are aiming for and why you want to
question the status quo.
So the first thing which needs to be investigated is one’s intent. What is
it that you are aiming for? Is it freedom from playing with your moustache and freedom from sleeping on your back? Or is
there something else, something more important in your life that you want to be free from? For me, my main aim was to
live with a man in perfect peace and harmony, twenty four hours a day. For that goal I successively was ready to give up
religion, friends and peers, the ‘sisterhood’, job, my identity and everything I thought and felt myself to be.
Living together in peace and harmony had been a longing all my life, and the failures of my former relationships had
made it clear that conventional solutions including the spiritual search did not bring the desired result. While Peter
and I were each dismantling our identities whenever they would hinder our peaceful living together, it became more and
more obvious that there was more involved that just a happy two-some. My whole identity was at stake, my whole life was
under investigation. If, for instance, I wanted to be free of being a nagging woman at home, then I had to get rid of
‘her’ completely, not just during the time I spent with Peter. So my original intent of a peaceful living together
very soon extended to an actual freedom from being my ‘self’ with everyone, irrevocably.
Actual Freedom is not a small enterprise. And it is not a clip-on to one’s
existing life to smooth some itchy habits and otherwise one stays the way one is. Actual Freedom is an enterprise that
you decide for boots and all, to investigate into the very core of your being, into your ego and soul, in order to
eliminate the very substance ‘you’ are made of – feelings, emotions, beliefs, instincts and imagination.
What I had said to Mark was:
‘The serendipitous thing in the process is that the brain – more and more
cleaned up from the debris of emotions, beliefs and instincts – seems to know exactly what it is doing in terms of
gene-splitting, altering the DNA, building synopses and cutting other false connections. The physical part is as much
happening by itself as are digestion, heartbeat and breathing. The ‘only’ thing I have to do is make sure that
beliefs, emotions and instincts don’t interfere in this perfect functioning mechanism, and then I can enjoy its
workings to the max.’ Vineeto to Mark, 16.5.1999
In other words, once I have done ‘my job’, once I have investigated into
my emotions, beliefs and instincts, the brain is doing the physical part of the change. But it is up to me to clean
myself up, to investigate, running the question of ‘how am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ I have to
remove every bit of my ‘self’ that is obstructing the smooth functioning of the brain. ‘I’ have to
self-immolate. And for that I need all the intent I can gather, all the courage I can muster and whatever
bloody-mindedness, patience, perseverance and determination I can pluck. And peak experiences and the success on the way
give me the confidence to keep going.

I have had a kind of ‘natural high’ experience
marked by a natural ‘ease’ in the last couple of days. I was driving home from work and, as my radio is broken, I
had nothing else to do but think. I have noticed that I have been, in a subtle way, fighting myself. First desiring
something that was impossible or dangerous but exciting and then indulging into sadness, despair, longing, imagination
provoked by this longing. I have recognized that if I want to be happy it must happen now. So, I looked what was keeping
me from happiness. And then I noticed my tendency to imagine things. As soon as I recognized this I felt a great relief
as I realized that if I really, really want to stop doing that... I can, by just putting my effort into it and by just
stopping doing that right now. As I realized this I felt a renewed commitment to continuing these investigations and to
being happy right now.
It is so good to come back here into the actual world whenever one notices
oneself going ‘off the planet’. From my experience, this commitment ‘to being happy right now’ included
looking at everything that kept me from being happy. That could be pleasant or fearful fantasies, social conditioning,
power struggles with the opposite sex, rigid ideas of how people or the world should be and many other facets of the
Human Condition. But each time I removed one of the obstacles of being happy right now, whenever they appeared, I was
rewarded with a greater sense of freedom, one reason less to be unhappy and a great sense of achievement – the method
actually works.

Good to hear from you. So you have been reading the web-sites and
experimenting enough to come up with some very precise questions.
First, it is good to get some method in one’s way of thinking. When I met
Richard, this is what I remember as one of the first things we talked about – how to think, contemplate and inquire in
a way that there is some result. He told me that it is useful to always come back to the question or topic from where I
started and not – as our untrained brains tend to do – get lost in the different alleys and branches of speculation,
imagination or irrelevant side-issues. Particularly when the subject is emotionally challenging, when a dearly-held
belief is questioned and when fear arises, we are usually very quick in changing the subject and steering away from the
‘dangerous’ area. But when investigating the Human Condition in oneself, there will be lots of ‘dangerous’ areas
of contemplation, there will be beliefs to be dismantled and emotions to unveil. That’s the whole purpose of the
investigation in the first place, to discover the underlying beliefs and instinctual passions of a certain behaviour or
emotional reaction, to uncover and eliminate one’s very ‘self’.
So, you made a good start with listing your queries. I will play the
librarian and give you directions where you will find Richard’s, Peter’s or my writing and correspondence on the
topic. You wrote:
Here are some questions that I have:
-
What are the questions if you actively challenge your beliefs, feelings,
emotions and instincts. How to deal with them. How can you ‘see’ through them all. If one has dismantled one belief
then all the others can be too, in the same way, or not?
The main question, that works for all of the Human Condition is ‘How am I
experiencing this moment of being alive?’ We composed a whole page, called ‘How to Become Free
of the Human Condition’ on the topic with many links of writing and correspondence of how to apply this ongoing
question in your daily life.
I started with the understanding that it is only me who I can change, and
that very understanding applies to everybody I meet, live with, work with and to the world at large. So, if anything in
the day evoked an emotional reaction, I would start digging around and look for the cause in me, what belief, feeling
and instinctual passion caused me to feel annoyed, fearful, angry, righteous, insecure, disgusted, loving, elusive,
tired, etc.
The first beliefs that I had to investigate were about male and female
conditioning, my female identity, the belief in the ‘right to be emotional’, the ‘truth’ of intuition etc. Along
with gender-issues came the problem of believing or fighting a supposed authority, which had been an emotionally charged
topic since my early years.
Usually under every emotional reaction I would find a firmly held belief in
some ‘truth’ which I then, in due course, questioned and replaced with actual facts, investigated through reading,
contemplating or talking with Peter and Richard, instead of simply taking on what others had told me to believe. It can
sometimes be a fascinating and sometimes be a frightening adventure, after all, it is your very identity that you are
taking apart, who you believe and feel yourself to be.
When one belief was seen in its complexity with all its implications on
various areas in my life, when I understood it to be merely a passionate thought and not factual, this belief
disappeared. It’s like the fairy story of Sinterclaas (or Father Christmas) – once you know that he is only the
neighbour with a false beard, the whole myth falls to pieces and you are never able to believe it again. But each belief
has to be investigated on its own ... there is not a mathematical magic formula that deletes them all at once.
Eventually you see through the whole lot – and what a relief and liberation that is!
For me, the only method is to move from speculation to facts, from beliefs to
facts, from emotional reaction to considering the silly and the sensible options. What is keeping me from being happy
and harmless now, here, in this very moment of being alive? If I am not happy, there is always an observation to be
done.

Richard: Honestly ... I cannot make sense of this that
you write here. May I suggest, instead, that the next time fear happens that you ‘be with it’ without moving in any
direction whatsoever until it becomes apparent that ‘you are fear and fear is you’? It is so much easier than all
this intellectualising ... and far more rewarding.
Because it will be the end of ‘you’.
Richard, List B, No 31
Of course, the last sentence got my full attention.
I took the emotion at the time – fierce frustration about not ‘getting
the point’ – and lay on the couch for experimenting and contemplating. The outcome was fascinating, to say the
least. Digging myself to the very core of the feeling I discovered frustration as just being a cunning distraction from
the underlying fear and, even deeper, found the mother of all instincts: ‘I don’t want to die’, which includes ‘I
as species have to perpetuate. So here I found again what you said, Richard, that ‘I’ am ‘the many’ and ‘the
many’ is ‘me’.
Ignoring all the flashing stop-signs I reached to the stunningly clear
perception of what ‘I’ consist of – a software survival program, causing emotion-producing chemicals and kept
alive through the notion that this is me, all of me. The process of seeing the program of ‘me’, the ‘self’, in
action was like lifting it from its nourishing soil, airing it, so to speak, and thus depriving it from its very
life-source – even if only for a short time. That alien entity ‘me’ that I had been taking examining since so long
was finally seen and experienced as something other than this physical body. These moments of apperception, of the bare
awareness of ‘who I am’ now rock the boat and create all kinds of mental and physical nuisance like headache and
angst, only to confirm that this experience was not just a dream.

Actually, I have found that everything is always ok
at this moment right now and running the question ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive’ is a great tool
for keeping me in this moment.
That’s all for now. Thanks for being there and thanks to all of you for
making this list and this website available and for your willingness to help.
The question of ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive’ is not
only ‘a great tool for keeping me in this moment’ but it is also the precise method to remove every single
obstacle that prevents one from experiencing this moment as perfect.
You see, with this method you can do much more than calming yourself or be ‘in
this moment’ – you can become actually and permanently free of all the worries and fears, depression and
resentment, sorrow and malice, free from the Human Condition altogether. With this method you can examine and
investigate what keeps you from being happy and harmless in this very moment and remove the disturbing element, ‘me’,
‘ego’ and ‘soul’, irrevocably and forever.
Of course, this enterprise is not for the ‘faint
of heart and weak of knees’ as Richard usually puts it, but it is the best that I have ever done in my
life. What adventure, what delight.

Why don’t you just tell us how to experience this
freedom that you talk about. How to live life in freedom 24 hours a day? You keep on talking about everything but you
never share how we, poor ignorant sannyasins can also live in this ‘third alternative’ realm. Isn’t it not the
time that you once and for all share the ‘how’ to this thing you are always talking about?
I am glad you asked. Also you say:
A real intelligent person would not have any
beliefs. He would be a ‘seeker’ and at the same time rely on his own understanding and not believe.
I agree fully with your understanding that it is very good to question all
the beliefs that one has. It is the first and most important step to experience the actual world, which is here all
the time, only hidden under all the concepts, emotions and beliefs we have piled on top of it. For instance, the moon
was for Mr. Gurdjieff not just the piece of rock circling the earth, but the place where all souls would go after death.
How could he see the moon as the big piece of rock and grey sand that it factually is?
And freedom is a ‘boots and all’ adventure, it is about turning one’s
head inside out and upside down, it is re-wiring one’s brain. Slowly, slowly you come to question everything you have
ever learned, and on the way you are finding out the extent of what you have been taught! So many ideas and ‘truths’
I had taken for granted, some of which have come with the mother’s milk, or school-teachers, or other ‘respectable’
authorities, and then these ideas and ‘truths’ would, with relentless investigation, turn out to be mere
assumptions, beliefs, opinions and not at all facts. So you can brace yourself for many a surprise and, as I say, the
safe carpet under your feet will disappear many times.
Yes, where to start! How Peter started, after he understood that Richard had
something valuable to offer – he went there, for six month, every day, and sat in Richard’s lounge-room to absorb
this so strange, unheard-of, and bewildering way to see and experience the world. He learned from the spoken word, but
also he was reading Richard’s journal at least a dozen times. There is definitely no transmission happening, no
energy-work involved. It is possible to understand the flavour of this actual world by words, and there are about a
million of words available now. Alan has found Richard via search on the internet and digs himself out of the Human
Condition by reading every bit of Richard’s writing and correspondence over and over again, as well as Peter’s
journal and our conversations here on the mailing-list. Personal presence is not required at all – a remarkable and
vital difference to the spiritual transmission of ‘Wisdom’ and the Master’s ‘Energy’.
I spent a lot of time with Peter and had some resistance at the start –
being a devout sannyasin then – but was exposed to Peter’s stories and discoveries day by day. Some of the
bewildering news would stick, some of it would make sense and then – the first successes became apparent from
investigating into my own psyche, my own behaviour, my own emotions...
You can’t sit in our lounge room listening to stories, but you can read
them. Read and read and re-read. Until something in your brain starts shifting, clicking, doubting the old,
understanding the ‘actual’, and you will start seeing and sometimes experiencing what Richard means by ‘actually
being here’. Whenever your head starts fuming, remember that you are tackling 20 odd years of conditioning, of looking
at things from a certain background, packed with feelings, intuition and beliefs. And not only are you investigating
your own behaviour and conditioning, but you are dismantling the whole of the Human Condition, which means, everything
that everybody has believed up to now, Ancient Wisdom that has been passed down the ages. It is not a small thing we are
doing. It is a true pioneer’s job, the adventure of a lifetime – being one of the first to discover virgin
territory, an Actual Freedom from the Human Condition.
The other thing that one can do is write. We have an Actual Freedom
mailing-list, as you probably know, and particularly Alan, Peter and I have written quite a few letters about our
adventures in moving on the path to the actual world and leaving the ‘real’ world of malice and sorrow behind,
including all the various fears, doubts, qualms and headaches that are par for the course in this adventure. You might
find something interesting in the archives and may feel inclined to share about your particular questions and
investigations. How to get on? Click on the ‘subscribe to mailing-list’ button on our web-site home page and
you will have a reply back within a few hours.
The first thing I had to do after 17 years of spiritual conditioning was to
switch my brain back on. I delighted in using my intelligence again, started doubting the old, used scrutiny and
discrimination to slowly question everything that I had taken for granted wisdom. What a gullible person I had been, you
could have told me any fairy-story of astrology and invisible energies, channelling and chakras, and I was ready to
believe it all! Investigating and using my intelligence again, I felt like being back in High school or University,
where intellect and intelligence are being trained, where it was o.k. to think, where I learned about facts – though
even many of those so-called facts later turned out to be mere assumptions, disguised as scientific theories. I
re-discovered the joy of discrimination, of relying on myself instead of authority, of using ‘silly’ and ‘sensible’
instead of moralistic appraisals.
And then I encountered fear – fear to leave the familiar fold – my peers,
my sannyasin friends and acquaintances, the women’s club with their particular beliefs and feelings,
family-sentiments, love-dreams. Most of all, I was fearful to question the authority of Osho, of God, of the divine plan
behind it all, and the belief in authority as such. Suddenly I had to realize and acknowledge that I am alone, standing
on my own two feet, nobody is there who knows ‘the truth’ and no all-caring and all-powerful ‘Existence’ is ‘taking
care of me’. Wow, what a bummer – and then, what a freedom. I can actually do what I want, think sensibly, take care
of myself without the concept of any Almighty God and enjoy life, even if everybody else chooses to be miserable for a
million and one reason.
If you think that the choice where to start with un-conditioning yourself is
too big, you can start with something simple like the weather. Weather is something so obviously outside of our control,
and yet almost everyone I meet complains about the weather. What a delight, when it is blue sky with vivid colours, what
a delight when it rains, wetting the ground, tinkering raindrops on the roof. If the weather annoys you, there is
something to look at, maybe it is some emotion surfacing about something completely unrelated to the weather or some
conviction being tickled that makes you wobble.
How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?
This is the core sentence and the method to all of Richard’s discoveries,
the key to the actual world. With this sentence you can take apart the whole of your psyche, bit by bit, digging deeper
and deeper into your unconscious. Whenever you are not happy now, there is something to look at. And every moment not
happy, or not investigating into the reasons of unhappiness, is a wasted moment. There is only now, only this moment;
yesterday is but a memory, tomorrow but a fantasy. If I waste this moment of being alive, because I am complaining about
something, or I am worried or half-hearted, it is a wasted moment of my life. It is so wonderfully simple, so obvious
– and yet, with all our conditioning, beliefs, emotions and instincts in action, it is very difficult to understand
and actualize. But now, with this method, you can examine and investigate everything that keeps you from being happy
now.
Richard has written a whole chapter about this vital issue of ‘This
moment of being alive’. This method brings you back into this moment of being alive, there is no other moment to be
experienced. If you don’t experience this moment as perfect, then this is the moment to apply change. It sounds so
simple, but hardly anybody ever does it.

How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?
This is the core sentence and the method to all of Richard’s discoveries,
the key to the actual world. With this sentence you can take apart the whole of your psyche, bit by bit, digging deeper
and deeper into your unconscious. Whenever you are not happy now, there is something to look at. And every moment not
happy, or not investigating into the reasons of unhappiness, is a wasted moment. There is only now, only this moment;
yesterday is but a memory, tomorrow but a fantasy. If I waste this moment of being alive, because I am complaining about
something, or I am worried or half-hearted, it is a wasted moment of my life. It is so wonderfully simple, so obvious
– and yet, with all our conditioning, beliefs, emotions and instincts in action, it is very difficult to understand
and actualize. But now, with this method, you can examine and investigate everything that keeps you from being happy
now.
There’s nothing new under the sun.
Well, if this is not new for you, tell me, what are your discoveries when you
apply this method, every day, each time you are not happy, each time you are proud, sarcastic, annoyed, bored,
irritated, sad, resigned, cynical, resigned or desperate?
If that method is all too well known to you, tell me what success you had
with it in your life. Are you happy and harmless, every day, whatever the circumstances? Do you live with your woman in
peace, harmony and equity all day long, day-in, day-out?
And, if it is not new, and you apply it with success, why do object to what I
say?
I have never come across such a radical and successful method before that can
clean you up completely from any identity whatsoever. Pursuing this method sincerely and relentless one can rid oneself
completely of the psychological and psychic entity inside of oneself.
I assume that’s why so many people object – it works. It has worked for
me, and I am nobody special. I am an ordinary person, a down to earth, normal, flesh and blood human being, and if I can
do it, anybody can do it who wants to take the challenge.

I appreciate your scrutiny.
Why?
Why scrutiny? Scrutiny has been one of the main tools to make me free.
Scrutinizing every so-called fact for its factuality, every belief for its validity – which I always found lacking –
and scrutinizing every emotion that went on in my head or my heart. Once I had understood that it is ‘I’ who is in
the road, my ego in the head and my soul in the heart, I started to scrutinize whenever emotions happened or beliefs
surfaced. Underlying both emotions and beliefs I found the instincts, in-built and innate in me and every other human
being. To become free of those beliefs I had to examine them thoroughly, study how they are expressed, and how they are
generally accepted in the moral system, the spiritual belief-system and amongst scientists. Everybody believes you
cannot change human nature. Well, I know you can change it – you can even get rid of instincts. And it was scrutiny
that brought me to that freedom.

When I describe the actual sensual experience of the world around me and when
I talk about eliminating beliefs and emotions in order to be capable of such pure experiencing the actual, I am talking
about the third alternative – tackling the root cause of the problem, not just transcending it. This means,
eliminating the Human Condition in you, not only dis-identifying from the duality of the good and bad of the ‘normal’
world. It also means eliminating the spiritual duality of ‘being the watcher’ to a supposedly ‘illusory world’.
The Third Alternative removes everything that is preventing one from experiencing the purity and perfection of the
actual world, which is already happening. Only because we are wearing grey-coloured or rose-coloured glasses because of
our conditioning, feelings, beliefs and instincts we are unable to see it.
I find the colours you repaint the past with to be
only yours. For me they are not valid as I perceive the past with my own mind’s filter. As long as I find that you
holding up a false past to compare your new third way to, I find your whole story to be contaminated with a false past.
If you were able to write from a clear space without
telling me everything I have experienced in the past is a shit brown colour... then perhaps... But as it is, your notion
that you have eliminated all dualities is just another falsehood ... because you keep making the same old comparisons in
every paragraph you write. Your third way seems nothing more than another illusion created by a tense mind.
When I took Sannyas I had been raised and conditioned as a catholic
middle-class German. In order to understand Osho I had to at least question those religious and social conditionings.
But I was ready to do so, because life wasn’t all that wonderful, burdened as I was with those conditionings. I
attempted to leave the ‘normal’ world of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ behind and entered the ‘spiritual’ world of
‘good dharma’ and ‘bad karma’.
At that time, I could have blamed Osho for ‘telling me everything I have
experienced in the past is a shit brown colour’. But my search was for freedom and I was willing to investigate
what other people had told me to be the truth.
With Actual Freedom a second de-conditioning took place, a spiritual
de-conditioning. And again, I was ready for it, because after all those years of sincere effort my search did not show
the results I had been aiming for. This second de-conditioning was much more radical and went far deeper than the first,
it is going to eliminate all of me, ego and soul, emotions and beliefs, instincts and ‘spiritual achievements’.
It leaves me as this physical body with its senses, free to delight in this pure, perfect and infinite universe as a
sensate and reflective flesh-and-blood human being. Nothing more, nothing less.
Actual Freedom provides a simple and effective method to achieving and is
available for everybody who wishes to go for the best – presupposing that you are discontent with your life as it is
now.

And then you wrote about your magic experience on the veggie farm at the
Ranch:
Then I heard a small voice in my head say to me –
there is no problem, O.K., you are leaving, but since you are here for only another afternoon why don’t you just let
go of this mind of yours that you know is making you so miserable, you can have it back at 5 o’clock when you leave,
and you can just enjoy this crazy outing. Sounded very logical, so I agreed. Immediately, I was in bliss. Suddenly,
everywhere was beauty and magic. It took me the whole time we were out in that field for me to plant just one artichoke.
You know, this is exactly what I mean, when I use the method of ‘How am I
experiencing this moment of being alive?’ Each time I ask that question, it becomes obvious that there is only this
moment, and if I am not happy now, I am wasting this moment of being alive. And out of that understanding I come back here,
into this moment of being alive, in its actuality, abundance, magic, perfection and purity. Or I tackle what stops
me from being here, what makes me unhappy, angry, sorrowful, malicious, fearful or desperate – and sort myself out,
such that I get back here. The magic is, it works each time.
Peter described it like this:
Sometimes, seeing through some part of ‘me’ as a
mere belief or instinctual pattern would come as a flash of realisation, sometimes as a slow painful dawning, which I
would fight tooth and nail, reluctant to even acknowledge, let alone throw out. But gradually I could notice the
psychological and psychic entity becoming thinner, actually weakening its hold over me. It then became apparent to me
that I was indeed fixing myself up! Peter’ s
Journal, Intelligence
Most awakenings come out of pain, out of crisis.
Were it not for suffering, how would we ever know anything was wrong? Like when there’s a splinter in your foot, you
know from the pain that it needs to be removed. In this case, it is natural to be open to a remedy. Yet, when suffering
is our life, we are less open to examine its cause. Somehow in the midst of my suicide crisis, I opened and trusted
enough to doubt what I thought was true, my own thinking, my conditioned self.
Yes, that is my experience too, in the midst of the crisis, I gathered enough
momentum to question everything I had believed before, and broke through to the actual world, which becomes apparent
when we stop piling ideas and beliefs on what we experience. We come our senses both literally and figuratively.
Very scary – and very magical. But in my experience it is not the pain that triggers the break-through, but having had
enough of it and desperately wanting to find a way out of that pain. There are also people who are so much in love with
their pain, they will never have an ‘awakening’, as you call it, or a break out of one’s dearly held belief
structure. It needs a certain sensibility to question both the inevitability of the pain and the ‘truth’ of one’s
present situation.

In order to come out of the real world one needs to investigate into the ‘hooks’
that keep pulling one back into misery, malice and fear – and investigate and eliminate them whenever they appear.
That is done by running the question: ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ Then everything that is
preventing you from feeling good will be examined and traced to its root.
Usually, when examining an emotion, the first thing I found was a certain
concept. By questioning the validity of it and the effects that this idea had in my life, I often recognised that it
fitted a general, collective belief-system. Questioning the collective belief proved a bit more scary. But it is only
fear that prevented me from acknowledging the belief as belief and the facts as facts. Acknowledging the facts brought
me back to here , back to my senses.
For instance, survival fear would blink red lights when I decided to quit
working with my former peer-group. Examining the facts revealed that I could easily survive without the income from that
particular job. But the instinctual fear blurred my view and made it great detective work to come to a sensible
evaluation. I had to see the instinct in its functioning in order to not be driven by it.

On a spiritual path a sub-personality called ‘watcher’
is often created. But doesn’t one need to create a sub-personality called an ‘investigator’ to investigate all
emotions, instincts and beliefs?
No, the ‘watcher’ is not a created sub-personality. The ‘watcher’ is
a created identity to eventually replace the ‘normal’ identity so one can become the Divine, ‘the Whole’, ‘That’.
You don’t need a sub-personality to investigate. You simply investigate. You apply ‘sensible’ and ‘silly’
instead of ‘feeling right’ or ‘feeling wrong’. It may happen in the course of investigating that you identify
yourself as the investigator – as I have done for a while – but I used it, riding on the thrill of being the ‘discoverer’.
But ruthlessly questioning every emotion and belief, this part of the affective identity was, in due
course, also discovered and eliminated. But first things first.
Also, I would like to know how you do it in
practice. My mind is so creative that it is willing to create emotions, problems, feelings, etc. forever... especially
when I start looking for them, trying to sort them out and make sense out of them. It is like a self psychoanalysis. Let’s
say you feel a bit anxious. You recognize it and see that you don’t feel that you perform well at work. So, you are
anxious because of that. Now, you analyse why you don’t perform well at work and there are several reasons: you don’t
like it so much but you need the money and like the life stability it provides; you feel somewhat depressed because of
the gloomy weather, you have got a nasty common cold and you feel that everything is grey and boring.
Yes, it is like self-psychoanalysis but with the aim of eliminating the
psyche, not, as traditional therapy does, ‘healing’ the psyche and shuffling the instinctual passions around a bit.
I used to compare it with moving furniture on the sinking Titanic. In the process, all the emotions and beliefs of the
Human Condition come in to scare you like ghosts. How dare you question your own ‘self’! But in persisting and
taking one step at the time, you find that slowly, slowly you start making sense, first of one bad mood, then another
and the success of a bit more freedom each time gives you the courage and strength to move on.
Taking your example gloomy weather – weather is something so obviously
outside of our control, and yet almost everyone I meet complains about the weather. What a delight, when it is blue sky
with vivid colours, what a delight when it rains, wetting the ground, tinkering on the roof. If the weather annoys you,
there is something to look at, maybe it is some emotion surfacing about something completely unrelated to the weather or
some dearly-held conviction being tickled that makes you wobble. When you stick with one issue until you found its
core-belief – it might take days – you will experience that it loses its grip, that you can see the implications and
ramifications. A bit more freedom from being affected by the weather is gained ... a bit more happiness.
What is the next step you do? Stay with your
feelings no matter how long they last. The common cold will be gone, you will get an interesting project eventually at
work and good sex at home? Do you turn on TV and enjoy a movie, read a book? Do you try to change your life (might no be
good idea if in bad mood).
Well, it is up to you. I usually stuck with one issue until I gained more
clarity. Some issues were too complex, I had to whittle away the surrounding emotions and beliefs first. But in the end
I knew that if I don’t tackle the subject now when its happening, it will be back in due time. So why not do it now?
But it is your life, your investigation, your pace. Peter and I have written in Peter’s Journal about
how we tackled our issues – which are more or less similar to everybody, as they are all part of the Human Condition.
(‘Intelligence’ is a good chapter for a description of his investigations). But the order and importance of the
issues are most likely to be different for everyone.
Some days you might wonder why you even dared to question the ‘Tried and
True’, or one could call it the ‘Tried and Failed’, what turmoil of questions you let yourself into. On other days
you may be dancing because you finally found the root-cause for your unease at work. It’s all a thrilling enterprise,
the adventure of a lifetime. It is such a fascinating thing to un-wire one’s own brain and to challenge the belief
that ‘Human Nature cannot be changed’. It is possible. It can be changed.
Or is it that because your main project in life is
self investigation, you don’t mind self investigation no matter how many black clouds are coming your way? You
remember a PCE as a reference point which lets you endure? Or maybe is it like you recognize how precious this life is
and enjoy the journey from nothing to nothing?
You asked what kept me going? Yes, the first and the following
peak-experiences were very important. I understood from these experiences that it is ‘me’ who is in the road, all of
‘me’. And so I set out to dismantle ‘me’, made up of beliefs, emotions and instincts. I developed a fine nose
for what is ‘me’ and what is simply the body and its senses, what is conditioning and what is the brain’s
intelligence and apperception. And I mistrusted every ‘believing’, every ‘feeling’. I dusted my brain off, got
it out of the cupboard where it had been put away as the ‘mind’ – in spiritual circles responsible for all evil
– and I started to use my discriminating and inquiring capacity to discover the actual facts under the rubbish heap of
‘gut-feelings’, intuition, ‘truths’ or general accepted conviction.
Sure, it raised a great deal of fear to strike off on my own from the group
that I ‘believed’ and ‘felt’ I belonged to. But with every discovered fact my confidence grew, with every
dismantled belief my dependency on others diminished, morals were replaced by ‘silly’ and ‘sensible’ and I could
use my own intelligence to make that choice.
Investigation and an actual freedom are my main project in life. It is the
only sensible thing to do with my life. I became vitally concerned with my own happiness and eliminating malice in me.
The PCE as the reference point showed me how easy and perfect it is, so why not have it 24 hours a day, every day? And
since it is only this moment that I can experience the delight of being alive, it would be a waste of time not to
experience the perfection of this moment. I have only this moment – it is as precious as anything. Without an
after-life to look forward to or worry about, I have maybe 30 more years and then that’s it. I didn’t want to waste
those 30 years in misery, doubt, depression, jealousy, hate or even a bad mood. That’s what kept me going through all
the dark clouds of fear, doubt or laziness.
It is not a journey from nothing to nothing – it is a journey from misery
to delight, from malice to harmlessness, from identity to not being separate, from ‘self’ to freedom.

Richard discovered that we can actually eliminate our instincts, not only
transcend them. The difference is that neither body nor the intelligent part of the brain have to be discarded or
transcended, but we simply clean ourselves from our software – the animal instincts and the sense of self. It is now
possible to live in the world, with all the pleasures the senses can provide, but without fear, aggression, nurture and
desire.
The method is to question not only what we call ego, but also our emotions,
beliefs and instinctual reactions, trace them down to their roots and understand their workings. The tricky bit is that
we are so used to seeing everything through the eyes and context of the self, this separate entity inside the body. That’s
where the peak-experience becomes important. Since it is a completely new and radically different approach and 180
degrees opposite spiritual beliefs, I give you Richard’s definition of a peak-experience:
pure consciousness experience (PCE) –– A PCE
is when one’s sense of identity temporarily vacates the throne and apperception occurs. Apperception is the mind’s
perception of itself ... it is a pure awareness. Normally the mind perceives through the senses and sorts the data
received according to its predilection; but the mind itself remains unperceived ... it is taken to be unknowable.
Apperception is when the ‘thinker’ and the ‘feeler’ is not and an unmediated awareness occurs. The pure
consciousness experience is as if one has eyes in the back of one’s head; there is a three hundred and sixty degree
awareness and all is self-evidently clear. This is knowing by direct experience, unmoderated by any ‘self’
whatsoever. One is able to see that ‘I’ and ‘me’ have been standing in the way of the perfection and purity that
is the essential character of this moment of being here becoming apparent. Here a solid and irrefutable native
intelligence can operate freely because the ‘thinker’ and the ‘feeler’ is in abeyance. One is the universe’s
experience of itself as a human being ... after all, the very stuff this body is made of is the very stuff of the
universe. There is no ‘outside’ to the perfection of the universe to come from; one only thought and felt that one
was a separate identity. Apperception is something that brings the facticity born out of a direct experience of the
actual. Then what one is (‘what’ not ‘who’) is these sense organs in operation: this seeing is me, this hearing
is me, this tasting is me, this touching is me, this smelling is me, and this thinking is me. Whereas ‘I’, the
identity, am inside the body: looking out through ‘my’ eyes as if looking out through a window, listening through
‘my’ ears as if they were microphones, tasting through ‘my’ tongue, touching through ‘my’ skin, smelling
through ‘my’ nose, and thinking through ‘my’ brain. Of course ‘I’ must feel isolated, alienated, alone and
lonely, for ‘I’ am cut off from the magnificence of the actual world – the world as-it-is – by ‘my’ very
presence. AF Glossary
Relying on the confidence of the peak-experience it is possible to start and
question one’s beliefs and determine the facts, distinguish silly and sensible and and dig into one’s conditioning.

‘The spiritual practice of ‘awareness’ only shifts one’s identity to
the ‘watcher’, a newly created spiritual identity. When those ‘transcended’ emotions and instincts return
because the watcher wasn’t watchful enough, they are raging in full force. Instincts are not being eliminated by
transcendence, not even reduced, they are only put aside through dis-identification.
No, not witness – eliminate, remove, extinguish. There is a big difference.
Witnessing creates a new entity, the ‘watcher’. One is to identify with and become the ‘watcher’ and dismiss or
transcend the rest as imaginary. Body-mind, emotion, thought and senses, as well as the physical world, are considered
an illusion, while Consciousness is proclaimed to be one’s true nature.’
You’re saying eliminate, how do you apply that in
practise? Please tell me more about your approach.
Where have you been? In many of our posts Peter and I have been talking about
eliminating emotions and very often described how we did it.
I remember your last mail to Peter where you said:
Until now your messages are not making my heart
sing. Are you perhaps ‘trying’ too hard?
I don’t think that this letter will make your heart sing, because it is the
‘heart’, the ‘feeling being’, that inhibits experiencing the perfection and purity of the actual world. It is
the ‘affective being’ that interprets what is actual with a wide range of emotional responses. Eliminating emotions
won’t make your heart sing, it will silence it forever. No longer will you feel sad, desperate, lonely, frightened,
melancholic, compassionate (i.e. suffering together), malicious, resentful, insulted, hopeful, jealous, angry, anxious
or hateful.
These emotions and instinctual passions will be replaced by something else,
something far superior. Pristine purity, perfection and the delight of heightened senses – a smorgasbord of tastes, a
cacophony of sounds, a magic range of vivid colours and movements, an abundance of smells. Without ‘self’ you will
be able to see and treat other people as your fellow human beings – benevolent and beneficent.
Now to your question: ‘How do you apply that in
practise?’
First of all, you have to be a seeker and an investigator and not a believer
or a follower. Then, I had to acknowledge the fact that my emotions are ‘me’ and by eliminating my emotions I am
eliminating the very essence of ‘me’. So this recipe for eliminating emotions and instincts is, in fact, a recipe
for the self-immolation of the psychological and psychic entity inside of you.
Peter gave a very descriptive report in his journal of how he did it:
‘Broadly, what emerged that I could relate to was
that I, as a human being, had been conditioned with a set of beliefs, which formed my identity, and that by identifying,
challenging and investigating these beliefs they could be discarded. Further, I had come into the world programmed with
a set of instincts, and these instincts too could be similarly eliminated. The ‘I’ that I thought I was, that
troublesome psychological entity, was actually nothing more than the sum total of these beliefs and the ‘me’, who I
felt I was, was at core the instinctual emotions of fear, aggression, nurture and desire! And the whole package could be
got rid of! Not transcended as in the spiritual world, but actually annihilated. It sounded good to me, if a touch
scary.
The essential method was to undertake a total investigation into anything
that was preventing me from being happy now – after all, the point of living is to be happy now, not at some time in
the future, or at some time in the past. The question to ask myself was, ‘How do I experience this moment of being
alive?’ Now is, after all, the only time I can experience being happy. Any emotion such as anger, frustration or
boredom that is preventing my happiness now, has to be traced back to its cause – the exact incident, thought,
expectation or disappointment. At the root of this emotion is inevitably found a belief or an instinct. The ruthless
challenging, exposing and understanding of these beliefs and instincts actually weakens their influence on my thoughts
and behaviour. The process, if followed diligently and obsessively, will ultimately cause them to disappear completely.
The idea, of course, being to eliminate the cause of my unhappiness, so that I can experience life at the optimum, now.
It soon presents success incrementally, as freedom from these beliefs and
instincts is indeed an actual freedom that results in increased peace and harmony for myself and in my relating with
those around me. The method does bring up fear and resistance, because one is dismantling one’s very ‘self’, those
very beliefs one holds so dearly.
It sounds so simple, but most people who had talked to Richard were not even
willing to take a small step along the way. Most people would seemingly like their life to be better, but faced with the
prospect of actually having to do something themselves, or having to change the way they are, soon sneak away, only to
re-run the ‘tried and failed’ methods. Of course, the major fear is that it will work and the ‘self’ will go!
For me, I just figured that I had ‘nothing left to lose’, it was either a slow, miserable, painful, death-like life
or a quick death of what I saw as the problem – the ‘self’ or psychological entity and psychic entity within.’ Peter’s Journal, ‘Introduction’
The core sentence and the key method to eliminating emotions is to ask
oneself ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ With this sentence you can take apart the whole of your
psyche, bit by bit, digging deeper and deeper into your unconscious. Whenever you are not happy now, there is something
to look at. And every moment not being happy, or not investigating into the reasons of unhappiness, is a wasted moment.
There is only now, there is only this moment, yesterday is but a memory, tomorrow but a fantasy. If I waste this moment
of being alive, because I am complaining about something, or because I am worried or half-hearted, it is a wasted moment
of my life. This method is so wonderfully simple, so obvious when you start applying it – and yet, with all our
conditioning, beliefs, instinctual passions and emotions in action, it is very difficult to comprehend and actualize.
But applying this method diligently and persistently, you can examine and investigate everything that keeps you from
being happy now. If you are interested, there is a detailed description on this
URL: http://www.actualfreedom.com.au/richard/articles/thismomentofbeingalive.htm
Richard gives a wonderful description of the time when the seeking stops and
one arrives at one’s destiny:
The day finally dawns when something irrevocable
happens inside the brain. In an ecstatic moment of being present, ‘I’ expire. ‘I’ am extirpated, rubbed out. ‘I’
cease to exist, permanently. There is a sensation inside the top of the brain-stem that is experienced as a physical ‘turning
over’ of some kind ... something that can never, ever, turn back. Something irrevocable happens and everything is
different, somehow, although everything stays the same physically ... with the outstanding exception of a perfection and
purity permeating all and everything. Something has changed, although it is as if nothing has happened ... except that
the entire world is transformed into a magical fairy-tale-like playground full of incredible joy and delight that is
never-ending. ‘My’ demise was as fictitious as ‘my’ apparent presence. I have always been here, I realize, that
‘I’ only imagined that ‘I’ existed. It was all an emotional play in a fertile imagination ... which was,
however, fuelled by an actual hormonal substance triggered off from within the brain-stem. Richard’s Journal, Article 18

Does, what you call ‘elimination’, happen
without effort, or is it something that has to be ‘done’?
While I am taking a particular emotion or belief apart, digging deeper and
deeper into its root cause, something is ‘done’, effort is applied. I am using my brain, contemplating,
investigating, searching, daring, asking, questioning, doubting, until I get to the bottom of that particular issue. It
is part of ‘me’, an alien, but fiercely defended, entity inside my body, for ‘I’ am nothing but my feelings,
emotions, beliefs and instinctual passions. Hence ‘I’ will do everything to obstruct this questioning, this
investigating and this eliminating, for ‘I’ am terribly afraid to die.
To investigate in spite of that fear requires courage, effort and a burning
intent. Only after I have dug deeply into that issue, exposed it to the light of awareness and understanding, it will
disappear ‘without effort’, never to rear its ugly head again.
At the same time, removing the filtering veils of beliefs and fears, my
senses become heightened, I am more here and less in fear, love, hope, churning emotions or in remote fairy-worlds. I am
on this planet, on the chair, the rain pouring on the leaves sounds deliciously in my ears, the fridge is humming, my
toes curling in delight. Life is eminently easy and wonder-ful, magically abundant and carefree. Once all discoveries
are made, all beliefs dismantled, all instincts laid bare, they go up in smoke and ‘I’ will die the illusory death
that ends the existence of the ‘self’. To investigate into the survival instincts of the ‘self’ is effort,
living in this actual world is utterly effortless, an ongoing delight.

How did you find Richard’s Journal? Have you given up after the first
chapter because it is so dense and choc-a-block full with unknown words?
I am enjoying reading his journal and I am still at
it, as I am reading different books at the same time.
Just a suggestion – because Actual Freedom lies 180 degrees opposite to all
spiritual beliefs, as you might have understood from your meeting with Richard – it is definitely less confusing to
read Richard’s Journal by itself, without mixing it with other writings. Words might look similar – and being
spiritually conditioned one easily translates Richard’s words into meaning something spiritual. After all, the
spiritual world is all one knows – with the rare exceptions of a pure consciousness experience. To interpret the
actual into something ethereal, supernatural or spiritual would be missing the point completely.
Personally I had to read the journal, particularly certain paragraphs and
passages, many times over until I got my first glimpses of the non-spiritual actual and down-to-earth nature of what
Richard is saying. Further I had long discussions with Peter about it, doing a reality check by comparing my
understanding and opinion with his. Now it all looks obvious and transparent, but back in my spiritual days, some of
Richard’s words fitted my beliefs, convictions, feelings and intuition, and some just didn’t make sense until I
questioned all of my own beliefs, one after the other...
The story of what happened when I popped through the thick clouds of beliefs
and saw the actual world for the first time, you will find in Vineeto’s Bit of Peter’s Journal (pg193ff).

Actualism Homepage
Freedom from the Human Condition – Happy and Harmless
Vineeto’s Text © The Actual Freedom
Trust
|