|
Discussions about
Spiritual Scientists
Albert Einstein
Richard | Peter
David Bohm
Richard | Peter
Paul Davies
Daniel Goleman
Stephen Hawking
Richard | Peter
Roger Penrose
Richard | Peter
Darryl Reanney
________________
Related
Links
Agnosticism
| Science
Darksucker Hypothesis
|
|
Please note that the text below was written by the feeling-being ‘Peter’ while ‘he’ lived in a
pragmatic (methodological), still-in-control/same-way-of-being Virtual Freedom before becoming actually free.
|
Spiritual
& Metaphysical Scientists
science — 1 a the systematic study of man and his environment based on the
deduction and inferences which can be made, and the general laws which can be formulated, from
reproductible observations and measurements of events and parameters within the universe; b the knowledge so obtained. 2
systematized knowledge in general. 3 a a particular branch of knowledge; b skill, proficiency. Oxford Dictionary
Peter: I do discern two strands of science:
-
physical science (which properly contains ‘pure
science’ and ‘applied science’)
-
metaphysical science (which properly contains ‘science
fiction’ and ‘mystical science’)
The scientific studies involved with studying the ‘big’
picture of the universe, the macroscopic – cosmology – as well as the study of the microscopic – quantum physics – both
leave the realm of reproducible observations and measurements of events and parameters within the universe.
As science studies the cosmos, the measurements very
quickly become so huge as to be inconceivable, non-sensical (beyond what we can perceive with our senses) and immeasurable –
both in distance and time. Similarly, when science studies the sub-atomic, the measurements very quickly become so minute as to be
inconceivable, non-sensical (beyond what we can perceive with our senses) and immeasurable.
Science has great difficulty with both infinite and
zero – both figures make any mathematical equation instantly and irrevocably unworkable. Given the lack of any measurable
factual data to work with, both the macroscopic and microscopic sciences have developed into theoretical sciences – a field of
study where reproducible observations and measurements of events and parameters play no part and where theories,
speculation, imagination and fantasy abound.
Unfettered by any physical considerations or restraints these sciences
thus become metaphysical sciences and, as such, have conveniently co-opted many theories from the mystical world. Thus we have the
‘parallel universes theory’ (‘other-worlds’), creation and doomsday events (God by any other name), particles that only
exist when one is looking at them (an illusionary world), the universal Theory of Everything (the Truth), etc., etc. The cute
thing is that theoretical scientists quote the ancient mystics as validation of their theories, and the modern mystics quote the
theoretical scientists as validation for their fantasies – an infinite regression of insanity.
|
