|
Related Discussions
Richard | 2 |
Peter | 2 |
Vineeto
Others
|
|
Please note that the text below was written by the feeling-being ‘Peter’ while ‘he’ lived in a
pragmatic (methodological), still-in-control/same-way-of-being Virtual Freedom before becoming actually free.
|
Naiveté
Naiveté: The state or
quality of being naïve; innocence, artlessness, childlikeness, simplicity, ingenuousness, guilelessness, lack of guile,
unsophistication, lack of sophistication, unworldliness, naturalness, candour. Oxford
Dictionary
Peter: Naiveté is so vital to freedom. This is because even
the strictest application of moralistic and ethicalistic injunctions will never lead to the clean clarity of the purity of living
the perfection of the infinitude of this material universe. Purity is an actual condition – intrinsic to this universe – that
a human being can tap into by pure intent. Pure intent can be activated with earnest attention paid to the state of naiveté. To
be naïve is to be virginal, unaffected, unselfconsciously artless ... in short: ingenuous. Naiveté is a much-maligned word,
having the common assumption that it implies gullibility. Nevertheless, to be naïve means to be simple and unsophisticated.
Pride is derived from an intellect inured to naïve innocence; to such an intellect, to
be guileless appears to be gullible, stupid. In actuality, one has to be gullible to be sophisticated, to be wise in the ways of
the real world. The ‘worldly-wise’ realists are not in touch with the purity of innocence; they readily obey the peremptory
decrees of the cultured sophisticates. A sample of such decrees are: ‘I didn’t come down in the last shower’, or ‘I wasn’t
born yesterday’, or ‘You’ve got to be tough to survive in the real world’, or ‘It’s dog eat dog out there’ ... and
so on. Such people are said to have ‘lost their innocence’. Human beings have not ‘lost their innocence’ ... they never
had it in the first place.
|
Innocence is
something entirely new; it has never existed in human beings before. It is an evolutionary break-through to come upon innocence.
It is a mutation of the human brain. Naiveté is a necessary precursor to invoke the condition of innocence. One surely has to be
naïve to contemplate the profound notion that this universe is benign, friendly. One needs to be naïve to consider that this
universe has an inherent imperative for well-being to flourish; that it has a built-in benevolence available to one who is
artless, without guile.
To the realist – the ‘worldly-wise’
– this appears like utter foolishness. After all, life is a ‘vale of tears’ and one must ‘make the best of a bad situation’
because one ‘can’t change human nature’; and therefore ‘you have to fight for your rights’. This derogatory advice is
endlessly forthcoming; the put-down of the universe goes on ad nauseam, wherever one travels throughout the world. This universe
is so enormous in size – infinity being as enormous as it can get – and so magnificent in its scope – eternity being as
magnificent as it can get – how on earth could anyone believe for a minute that it is all here for humans to be forever
miserable and malicious in?
It is foolishness of the highest order to believe it
to be impossible to be free.
 Library Index
Freedom from the Human Condition – Happy and Harmless
Peter’s Text ©The Actual Freedom
Trust: 1997-. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer and Use Restrictions
|
