|
Others ~ Selected Correspondence Calenture
I’ve been pondering a good while over your last post and on how and what to respond … after some time it hit me that I haven’t yet the experience to answer most of your questions. However, I am overly experienced in a particular area; in fact, I am far, far more experienced than Peter, Vineeto and (yes) even Richard, on probably your favourite subject: Actualist Calenture. I think it necessary to outline and expose some of what is entailed in being subject to this most curious event. Of course, and please, feel free to correct and/or expand on my observations if need to.
A continuous sequence of emotion-backed thoughts which give rise to yet another version of who I am and what I identify with – or who I want to be (or not be) and what I want to identify (or un-identify) with; as in a bunch of ‘my’ ideas, images, feelings and thoughts (influenced by feelings) on what Actualism seems to be all about and living according to them. When is somebody in danger of acquiring Actualist Calenture? When one is not scrupulously honest with oneself and has a vested interest, other than being happy and harmless, in regards to pursuing Actualism; or, in other words, no pure intent.
Even though it was very difficult to admit that I was only kidding myself, every time I did an ‘ego’ check it was obviously still present and even more sophisticated (no naivety to be found) and identified with my most recently acquired philosophy; and when I did a ‘Soul’ check it would be all blown out of proportion (aka aggrandizement) and identified with my most recently acquired set of emotion-backed thoughts. I started observing how most of my day was neither spent being happy nor harmless and so I felt cocksure of having enough evidence to claim that Actualism ‘doesn’t work’. I had spent a good deal of time gathering all my truthful facts about Actualism, and its failure to deliver the goods that it promised, but in the end my whole case shattered before me. I had an insight and saw the extent I was going to in order to avoid change … it is so difficult to break from the past. Since that day I actually started to care to read with both eyes what was being offered by The Actual Freedom ‘promoters’; and I started reading, even the things I had already read several times, in a completely different light … and what a difference it made. No 54, something in me still wants you or somebody else – for I was unable – to find an actual contradiction in Actualism, for the past still has a strong hold on me as does the future, but I have already lost faith in that too … not that it can’t happen but it’s just impossible for me to conceive as my understanding becomes more and more experiential. I can’t say I worry too much about it either for I am having so much fun. But here’s hoping … One possible mistake being made by Mr. Richard and his promoters is in thinking that just because Mr. Richard’s tech works for them to a fair degree, it can be as effective for anyone equally committed. In my observation and experience that isn’t necessarily so. As ego-structures, people are not all the same ... science and common sense observation shows that to be so: left-brained vs right brained, introverted vs extroverted, etc. Some folks may have a helluva hard time moving from the tech question ‘how am I experiencing...’ to the causal reasons for their unhappy experience of the moment. Watch this list, and particularly the responses of the teaching students, for signs of impatience and lack of understanding for the ‘slow kids’ in the class ... for whom this tech may be woefully inadequate to peel the many layers of the ego-self onion Almost any human being can be conditioned, or acquire ‘the layers of the ego-self onion’, so why couldn’t almost any human being be un-conditioned too? I hope to have assisted you in furthering your investigation. No 47 to No 54 Web page designed by The Actual Freedom Trust |