No 65 to No 66: There’s something insipid
about you mate, kind of sluggish, makes most of your posts a ‘pass’. You really know how to have yourself on don’t
you mate? And the clergy recognised it too. You have all the credentials. Top quality gullible, hypnotizable,
narcissistic, brown nosed, copy cat stock. I would not be surprised if you are growing a big ol’ grandaddy beard as we
speak. Just like Peter did. Ugh. 1.1.2006
No 65 to Richard: What I am referring to
– if you had cared to ‘re-read’ what I wrote with both eyes open this time – was the way you dictatorially
assert your interpretation/ hypotheses as the final arbiter and communicate with your correspondents as though theirs
amount to jack shit. 27.1.2006
No 65 to Richard: The only thing I am
interested in discussing with you Richard is your condescending verbal attacks on your correspondents and your inability
to see it – i.e. smell your own shit. 29.1.2006
No 65 to No 60: Doncha love it. That’s it
No 60 you’re a write off now. It’s been decreed by the almighty Vineeto, you are a flawed creature. There’s no
hope for you now mate, and even in 11 years, these three are gonna drag out their copy and pastes and remind you of your
‘givens’. Oh boohoo. 31.1.2006
No 65 to Vineeto: WOW!! Either things are
quiet in your neck of the woods or you can’t recognise a goof off when you see one. And to respond to it sentence by
sentence even? AND SERIOUSLY? You’re not well Vineeto, not well at all. [Addendum] In fact you have responded exactly
like an offended Muslim who can’t handle a cartoon. So much for virtual freedom eh? 1.2.2006
No 65 to No 37: I can’t help but notice how
you weave in and out of some of your posts, distancing yourself to the 2nd person when your observations are
not self flattering. But then you bow out to pontificate: … Then you re-enter to pat yourself on the back? for
realising: … If you hadn’t started preaching? … Then you wax rhetorically, as though asking us to ask ourselves,
(since you no longer need to as these are your readers shortcomings not your own?) … (Those Muslim cartoons come to
mind now, but lets not get side tracked) 7.2.2006
No 65 to Richard: Handle it mate. Surely you
foresaw your own verbal expressions would come under the microscope (and if you didn’t, what does that say about your
much touted in depth examination of the human condition – of which so much has still ‘got you beat’). And to
dismiss it as the mere pooh-phoohing of recalcitrant ego’s is the vanity of an arrogant idiot who thinks his shit don’t
stink. Mate, no one forced you to go public with your hardwired lack of social IQ. If you can’t stand the heat ... don’t
come crying to us. 16.2.2006
