• No 38 to No 92: ‘Try WWW: ‘We do not
possess an ‘ego’. We are possessed by the idea of one.’ This needs to be read several times as there are multiple
layers (of your mind). Also, it is totally useless. And if *anyone* mentions the S-word, I will personally come to
Australia and kick their asses.’ Re Alan Watts, Dec 24, 2005 09:57 PST
• No 38 to No 92: ‘Despite the flack on this
list, it is way more fun than television. On second thought, it’s because of the flack, which may actually be
carefully designed mental probes. The issue is, who’s launching them?’ Sun
25/12/2005 3:22 AM
• No 38 to Richard: ‘I am deeply in awe of
your wordsmithery. Was there something of substance in there you were trying to say?’ Tue 27/12/2005 12:32 PM
• No 38 to Richard: ‘It’s so sweet to know
that I am still being quoted after all these years. What it has to do with the subject at hand eludes me. And you still
have big ones.’ Tue 27/12/2005 12:37 PM
• No 38: ‘No 66, it appears that you have an
advanced case of actualitis. The primary symptoms are overuse of quote marks and the pronoun one, indicating detachment
from the internal processes normally associated with I.’ Fri 30/12/2005 5:11 PM
• No 38 to Richard: ‘Perhaps you shouldn’t
say anything if this is the best you can come up with. I believe this may be a new low for you.’ Sat 31/12/2005 3:04 AM
• No 38 to Richard: ‘Actualists have been
around a while. I understand they were quite an important group until the discovery that the earth is round.’ Sat 31/12/2005 3:12 AM
• No 38 to No 66: ‘In a year, you will be
adding actualism to your string of failures. UG’s words are as useless as anyone else’s. (…) The bottom line is
that you’re just trying on hats looking for the perfect fit. Get used to the rain on your head.’ Sat 31/12/2005 8:36 AM
• No 38 to No 66: ‘Are you even aware of how
heavily you are channelling Richard?’ Sat 31/12/2005 8:40 AM
• No 38 to No 66: ‘You are too far gone,
monkey. You are going to have such a hangover.’ Sun 1/01/2006 7:26 AM
• No 38 to No 92: ‘Do you really want to
know, or are you satisfied with spitting cud?’ Sun 1/01/2006 12:25 PM
• No 38 to No 92: ‘I don’t expect you to
understand anything I say. If a doobie would help, go for it.’ Sun 1/01/2006 12:08
PM
• No 38 to No 65: ‘We call em greybeards.
Very pontifical, de rigueur for the males of the actualistic persuasion. Dead giveaway. That, and the overuse of ad
hominem or var.’ Sun 1/01/2006 12:23 PM
• No 38 to No 66: ‘‘Wow’ ‘that’ ‘is’
‘great’. ‘Have’ ‘another’ ‘banana’. ‘On’ ‘me’.’ Sun
1/01/2006 11:48 AM
